Civil Rules Interpretive Theory

An Interpretive Theory of Vagueness

I outline an interpretive theory of vagueness, emphasizing its advantages as a theory of language in use, compatibility with the data of descriptive linguistics, and its explanation for the interest-relativity of vagueness. Central to the theory is the notion that a 'language' in the usual sense is not a well-defined object but a cluster of more or less similar sound-meaning mappings which spea...

The Federal Rules of Civil Settlement

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were originally based upon a straightforward model of adjudication: Resolve the merits of cases at trial and use pretrial procedures to facilitate accurate trial outcomes. Though appealing in principle, this model has little relevance today. As is now well known, the endpoint around which the Federal Rules were structured—trial—virtually never occurs. Today,...

Robust Interpretive Parsing in Metrical Stress Theory

Logical Minimisation of Meta-Rules Within Meta-Interpretive Learning

Meta-Interpretive Learning (MIL) is an ILP technique which uses higher-order meta-rules to support predicate invention and learning of recursive definitions. In MIL the selection of meta-rules is analogous to the choice of refinement operators in a refinement graph search. The meta-rules determine the structure of permissible rules which in turn defines the hypothesis space. On the other hand, ...

Effects of the civil procedure rules on clinical negligence claims.

The frequency with which clinicians can expect to face allegations of clinical negligence and court proceedings related to those allegations is likely to increase in coming years. The processes of investigation and defence have been modified by the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules in 1999. This review outlines these developments and emphasises the need for speedy and comprehensive resp...